13. 47-42! Move, made ​​for false assault with 33-28.

17. 30-25?
Debut drawn well, even with a good initiative. You could start pressure (30-24!). But then I thought that the enemy is set peacefully (6 draws in a row) and decided to play a simpler.

21. ... 17-22.

It became a little uncomfortable, though not much worse position.

40. 29-24.

Here I would like to begin to negotiate for peace: fortieth move, seven pieces on the board, the position of such a simple and often protected by a high level. But could not do this, as the position I have less and in a moment it would be wrong to stop all the heat of struggle. I have a rule: "do not offer the grandmaster draws in much worse position, not allowing him to fully implement.

Why I pay attention here? Many players will get the worst position and just say, "Draw?" Some say it even in losing positions. This is wrong. Most do it, and then propose.
Russian championship in 2011 in a party with Chizhov draw was offered to me in three drafts. Although I (and Alex, of course) saw a draw, with 5, 4 ​​drafts, it would be wrong to take away the chance to win. In general, the proposal draws in a worse position - it is a personal issue for each.

So I decided to find their own draw, made ​​a move and went for a walk.
46. 37-32. Such positions are not won, I felt so all played very fast.

48. 49-43 11-16.
Difficult situation on the board, but half an hour to 15 minutes, soothe your opponent.

Then I thought about play and 32-27 in 23-29? 27-21! =. However, simple assault, and no growth can not defend themselves.

I had to choose an forcing version of the "intuitive" in a draw. 49. 30-25.

57. ... 22-27.  A series of nine strokes over, the question of what to record a draw?

58. 28-22? Loses. After a 35-30, 19-24, 25-20, 20x40 35x44, 28-22, =.
Does not win 59. ... 27-32 and 19-24, as checkers "run up" in the corners.

59. ... 39-44? The natural course of which, however, makes it a draw. had to be translated into 48.

61. 07-01! (61. 07-02? 19-23, 62. ... 44-49x).
61. ... 40-45. 62. 01-07?? Lost an important tempo. The maneuver, which was held later on the course, you had to do now

64. ... 24-29? (19-23, 4-15 24-30!! 35x24 49-35, 24-20 35-19x)
...
68. 29-33! 69. 41-19! Otherwise, catch Kings
49-27?  Does not win.
The win was nice after tangling on tee:

69. ... 33-38 70. 19-41 50-22 71. 20-14 22-4 72. 41-47.

(41-36? n anticipation of the next variant, but not seeing it ...
In this scenario, I planned to make a draw, but 04-31!x This move has dropped out of the calculation)

73. ... 38-43 5. 47-15. (47-36 49-44!!x Standard and also a good idea. I wonder what is it that prevented it to go to my opponent?)
5. ...43-48 6. 14-10 49-32! 7. 10-5 32-46 8. 15-47 4-36 9. 47-15 48-26 10. 15-47. (15-10 26-37x) 10. ... 26-31 11. 47-15 36-47 12. 15-4. Only move.  12. ... 31-36 13. 4-10 47-24!!x.

Is not this the beauty of checkers, which should display each player?
Alas, everything has remained behind the scenes: (
Concluding the party.

70. 20-14 27-04 71. 19-24 33-39 72. 24-15 04-13 1-1.
In this game I've released 2 draws and 3 times, he could lose.

Sergey.

The party has once again proved wrong strategy exchange checker and setbacks.
Almost all of the time I listen to Russian RAP want to convert a string chorus of one classroom the artist's under the checkers.

?? ?? ???, ????? ??????? ??????,
?????? ???, ???? ???????, ???? ?????!
?? ????? ???? ??? - ?? ?????.
??????, ??????? ???? ??? ????. 

?????? ??????