Grappig, Roel forceert de winst tegen Samb met een onvervalste Samba Swing!  32.23-19!!   

Indeerdad Tjalling.   But I think that the most important moment is the move 31-28-23 !! The first keymove, which is blocking the piece "10", because on 10-14 then +1 piece via 24-19 and 34-30 + It means simply that Roel has produced a great attacking game. I would like to win a game with such a style.  We must notice that Ndiaga Samb, since his training matchpartijen with Ton Sijbrands, has been  under the influence of Ton Sijbrands with this Opening 1.34-29 20-25 :he likes it too much, almost all his last games with Jean Marc was with this openings,  check the semi-final of African championship, 20+10 game.  I am wondering if Roel Boomstra has prepared this OPENING, and then found the best active playing for white is to not accept the Hekstelling and play with the outpost on " 24 " via 29-24.  Also to quote Sijbrands, in the WK book 2003, in which he gave us a very long and wonderful analysis of his game with Gerard Jansen, 1.34-29 20-25, he has noticed  in the first lines, If I remember very well, that the move 5. 21-26 in the Opening gives a quick development to white and an active play via 41-37. In his game with Gerard Jansen he played the waiting move 5....5-10 first....then threat of 19-23x24.  But in that game a little difference is that Jansen has played 45-40 and only later 50-45,  while Roel played directly the 3.44-40 ? My be the first keymove against the Hekstelling of black !?  But may be Samb was not willing to introduce an Hekstelling schema, despite the 20-25 in the first move 1.34-29 20-25 ?!?  Anyway , we have a wonderful game and must congratulate both Oppenents for giving us such a beautiful game !! 

you GOOD

I guess 9... 16-21 followed by 12-17 is not right, since white simply develops a sound attack with 31-27 and changing, the left wing immediately gets active. Black should find something bettert han this. 

I understand

You see yourself that the day after the same Ndiaga Samb has played the same opening with Vice-World Champion, Jean Marc Ndjofang....and was really very lucjy to find a draw, may be with the help of tijdnood or time pressure.   In both games, one can learn that may be the right plan against the Hekstelling is indeed to switch  for an Outpost on "24" via 29-24x24 : with this voorpost, white is able to build a strong attacking game and indeed according to Katz , the piece on " 24" is then a " chitok " in russian technical word ; because of 15 and 25 !!    See here : http://toernooibase.kndb.nl/opvraag/applet.php?kl=46&Id=4676&r=5&jr=16&wed=837744 What is the logical sense of the strange move played on 06. 49-44 ???? 

White's early attack has only one problem, his left wing is not developed, so what Samb does looks not principal in my opinion. Roel himself wopuld also like to play this with black. Remeber his games against Schalley and Heusdens!  Actually, Broekkamp already showed that 1.34-29? is not right hahahahha. About 49-44. is there such a bog difference with 50-44? Maybe he wanted to cover sqaure 50, not allowing kingshots after 39-33 in some line?   

In plaats van 09-13 is opvallend genoeg 09-14 de beste zet

Analyse Roel Boomtra with lidraughts

.

Dank Piet en Roel voor de video! Even gewacht met reageren, om te bedenken waarom ik de video zo inspirerend vind: De partij wordt met prima engels begeleid en van de partij wordt voornamelijk de essentie besproken. Dat  houdt de vaart er in, wat zeer belangrijk is bij dit  medium. Het is bovendien goed te volgen voor gemiddelde  dammers! Knap. Mijn vijf cent, zoals de amerikanen dat zeggen (of zijn dat de britten?)....